I don't see how a change in standardized designs that would have such a significant and noticeable impact as I described could be dismissed as memory error. They are the standard because they are the most optimal, and even if the methods and plans for creating the most optimal design were lost, we could recreate/derive it again using existing knowledge and logic. Can we really dismiss 10x5 signs as being memory error now? I brought up standardized designs for this very reason.
Now that ME has caused the signs to be 5x10, the tops of vehicles would get clipped by the 5x10 signs. I gave a simplified dimensionless example of highway signs for simplicity but why was 10x5 the standard? Lets say previously we had 10x5 signs on the side of freeway overpasses and traffic flow wasn't affected due to the height of the signs being above minimum clearance requirements. Perhaps in a book, somewhere, or an obscure parody.Īt which point, 10x5 Highway signs would likely be dismissed as memory error. Residual evidence of a Highway sign being landscape, rather than portrait. Some people claiming that Highway signs were previously 10x5. As an ME, I'd expect it to manifest in the following manner:Įvidence that Highway signs were always 5x10.
0 kommentar(er)
